Valley Christian High School  *   100 Skyway Drive, San Jose, CA 95111  *   www.valleychristian.net

Stem Cell Research
By Brian Elwell and Michelle Balazs

Stem Cell Research has been the topic of controversy in the public’s eye, and the government, since 1998, but do people truly know what it is and how it could be a benefit or harm to the world?

Scientists are just begging to learn how to use and grow stem cells, but if their research brings the result they were looking for it could be a tremendous step for science that could bring great things, or an ethical battle of the conscience.

Pros of Stem Cell Reasearch
Cons of Stem Cell Research
Stem Cell Research has been the topic of controversy in the public’s eye, and the government, since 1998, but do people truly know what it is and how it could be a benefit or harm to the world?
Scientists are just begging to learn how to use and grow stem cells, but if their research brings the result they were looking for it could be a tremendous step for science that could bring great things, or an ethical battle of the conscience.
Contrary to media hype, there is no proof that embryonic stem cells will benefit patients with terminal diseases. However, killing embryos, to harvest stem cells as a way of saving these patients is contradictory. Destroying embyonic life to save another’s life is at best hypocritical and at worst murder.
The problem people have with stem cells is not stem cells, it’s abortion. For years abortion has been questioned back and forth from women’s rights to choose, to when is an embryo a person. While all these questions are valid, the real question we must ask ourselves is, will abortion ever stop? In the ideal situation abortion would be outlawed, and we would leave this all in the past. But will that ever happen? The answer is no, and while babies are being killed nothing good is coming out of it. If stem cell research was being properly funded not all would be lost in the abortion, and scientists could come even closer to saving millions of lives.
Stem cell research would use IVF, In Vitro Fertilization. That is when the fertilized eggs are placed in a woman’s uterus. Stem cell research would use this procedure to produce embryonic stem cell lines. IVF is already a technology that wastes a number of embryos annually. Following World War II, declarations were drafted in order to protect humans from the horrors of genetic experimentation. The same duty is owed to the tiniest, most vulnerable subjects. President Bush stated his goal of leading America into a “culture of life.”
Many people have been swayed by the misconception that if stem cells were being used, scientists would be growing organs and, “Playing God.” But this is far from the truth. Stem cells would not turn into an organ, but would change into tissues and would continually replace the bad tissues with good ones. Stem cells offer the possibility of a renewable source of replacement cells and tissues to treat many diseases, conditions, and disabilities including Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s diseases, spinal cord injury, stroke, burns, heart disease, diabetes, osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.
There is no evidence that embryonic stem cells can cure anything. In recent years, adult stem cell therapy has been successful in treating many diseases and shows great promise for the future. These cells are replaceable and can be found in “fat” cells and could be used for the purpose of treatment and research without destruction of embryos. Unfortunately, Californians voted to fund 3 billion dollars in stem cell research. It is a shame our tax dollars are going to fund such morally bankrupt science.
Over all Stem cells have huge potential and really should receive much government backing. This is no “Frankenstein science,” and it’s not cloning. This is just the evolution of every day medical breakthroughs.
There is no accepted physiological point at which the embryo suddenly becomes more human than before. The most recent research has demonstrated fetus viability at a much earlier age than previously believed. The pre-born should have the same moral status as the child or the adult, and therefore should not be killed for research purposes.